This feels stronger if you say what strategy work you already liked and what was still missing.
Search across courses, lessons, cases, drills, coaches and more.
I'm recruiting for McKinsey from a US MBA program. In case mocks, I sometimes give a recommendation that follows my analysis, but the interviewer challenges it anyway. Should I defend the answer, change it, or treat the pushback as a signal that I missed something?
This feels stronger if you say what strategy work you already liked and what was still missing.
ngl I like problem solving is probably too generic for someone who already did strategy before the MBA.
Sometimes the evidence is positive but there is still one big uncertainty. Is it acceptable to recommend a pilot rather than a full launch, or does that sound too cautious?
Mayank G.CoachA pilot can be the strongest recommendation when the expected upside is attractive but a material uncertainty is still unresolved.
Some mocks end while there are still unresolved issues. I find it hard to sound decisive when the analysis is incomplete. How should I structure a final recommendation when I know there are important things we have not tested?
Mayank G.CoachYou can still make a recommendation when the analysis is incomplete, but you need to separate what you know from what remains uncertain. Decisive does not mean pretending every question is closed.
I reached the end of a case and realized my recommendation depended heavily on an assumption we never tested. Should I still recommend, or say I don't have enough information?
Mayank G.CoachYou can still make a recommendation if you clearly state the assumption and the risk it creates.