Search across courses, lessons, cases, drills, coaches and more.
I finished university quite a while ago and my graduation year makes it obvious that I am older than most entry-level applicants. Should I explain that anywhere on the resume, or just let the experience speak for itself?
I have three years of work experience but I am younger than most people at my level. I am worried interviewers may see me as too junior for an experienced-hire role even though my responsibilities match the job description. Should I address age at all or just focus on the work I have done?
Mayank G.CoachDo not make age the issue unless the interviewer explicitly raises it. Experienced-hire credibility comes from scope, judgment, ownership, and the level at which you have already operated, not from looking a certain age.
37, PhD, and been in biotech for around 10 years now. mostly R&D / operating roles and did some startup stuff too where I got more involved on the business side. I applied to McKinsey for Associate because I'm thinking 2 to 3 years there could give me broader business experience and maybe help me move into a bigger leadership role in biotech after. but now I'm questioning whether this is just too…
Mayank G.Coach37 is not too old for McKinsey. The more important question is whether joining as an Associate gives you enough additional value relative to the experience you already have.
I am 39 and looking at experienced-hire roles rn. I know age is not supposed to be a formal blocker, but I am curious whether people have actually seen someone around this age join the regular consulting track, not just an expert role.
Mayank G.CoachYes, it happens, although it is less common than hiring people in the standard undergraduate, MBA, or early experienced-hire windows. At 39, firms are likely to look much more closely at how your prior experience translates and what level makes sense.