I think of it as objective -> structure -> analyze -> synthesize, then repeat as the case changes.
Search across courses, lessons, cases, drills, coaches and more.
how should i structure my case pathway
I think of it as objective -> structure -> analyze -> synthesize, then repeat as the case changes.
The pathway shouldn't be fixed. mine got better when I started updating it after every new exhibit.
Some case prompts seem to have two goals, like increasing profit while also growing market share. Should I create separate branches for each objective, prioritize one, or build a structure that explicitly shows the tradeoff between them?
Mayank G.CoachStart by clarifying how the two objectives relate. If one is primary and the other is a constraint, your structure should reflect that rather than treating both as equally weighted by default.
I am practicing nonprofit and public-sector cases where the client cares about social impact but still has budget constraints. How should I structure the problem when there is no single profit objective?
Mayank G.CoachStart by defining both objectives and the tradeoff between them before building the structure.
I'm recruiting for McKinsey from a US MBA program. In mocks, I can build a clean structure quickly, but the feedback is sometimes that it still sounds generic. How specific should my initial structure be before I start the analysis?
Mayank G.CoachStart with the client decision and build branches around the specific drivers that could change that decision.