Search across courses, lessons, cases, drills, coaches and more.
I can summarize at the end, but midway through a case my synthesis often turns into repeating every number we just calculated. What should a good mid-case synthesis actually include?
Mayank G.CoachAug 24, 2026Ex-BCG | 100% improvement guarantee or you don't pay! | Top 1% Coach!
A synthesis is not a recap of everything you did. It should state the answer so far, the evidence that matters, and what that implies for the next step.
The case insight-generation guide is useful for moving from analysis to meaning instead of simply reporting numbers.
Try a three-part pattern: current conclusion, one or two supporting facts, and the remaining question you need to resolve.
The 'what does this change?' question fixed this for me.
If you repeat all the math, it is a recap not synthesis.
Sometimes the interviewer pauses after a section and asks what I'm thinking so far. Should I give a recommendation even though we clearly haven't finished the case yet?
Mayank G.CoachYes. Give a provisional synthesis based on what you know so far.
My final recommendations usually include the answer, reasons and risks, but I struggle with unresolved questions. If the case never gave enough information on something important, should I explicitly say that in the recommendation?
Mayank G.CoachYes, if the unresolved point could materially change the decision.
My calculations are usually fine, but I keep ending with something like "so the answer is $25 million" and then waiting. I know I need a better 'so what.' What should I actually say after the math?
Mayank G.CoachTreat the number as evidence, not as the endpoint.