Search across courses, cases, drills, coaches and more.
When I practice case-based assessments, I either spend too long reading everything up front or I rush into the questions and keep going back to the case information.
For BCG CCA, what's a sensible balance between understanding the case first and preserving enough time for the actual questions?
I sometimes get attached to my initial hypothesis because I feel like changing it makes me look inconsistent. But obviously new information can point in a different direction. How should you change your hypothesis during a case without making it seem like the first one was just a random guess?
Mayank G.CoachYes. A hypothesis is supposed to guide your analysis, not lock you into your first idea. If new evidence contradicts it, updating the hypothesis is exactly what strong problem solving requires.
Just finished R1 and the case felt way easier than the practice cases I've been doing. Interviewer also didn't push me that much. Now I'm overthinking whether that means I missed something lol. Are some R1 cases genuinely straightforward?
Mayank G.CoachAn easy-feeling first round is not automatically a bad sign. Interview difficulty can vary by interviewer, office, case, and how naturally the problem fits your strengths.
There are tons of generic numerical-reasoning tests online, but they don't always look much like consulting OAs. Still worth doing for speed + accuracy, or better to spend almost all prep time on the firm-specific format?
Mayank G.CoachGeneric numerical-reasoning tests can help with underlying skills such as percentages, ratios, chart reading, and working accurately under time pressure. They are useful when those fundamentals are weak.